![pinnacle studio 19 reviews pinnacle studio 19 reviews](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/06d3xymHcGd7cDXV9iMVIWu-7..v1569469970.jpg)
In each case, I was looking at speed, interface intuitiveness, raw functionality, rendering speed and issues and quality of the final result. a file which can be uploaded to YouTube or similar (for the current and future generations, who are more tech-savvy).
Pinnacle studio 19 reviews 1080p#
I should explain that my goal was to emulate a typical smartphone user's task of collating captured 1080p video in MP4 files, imported via USB or (as a last resort) backed up and then downloaded via OneDrive or similar, then trimming them, overlaying and inserting stills, adding titles and then exporting at full resolution and quality to both: So commercial it is, with Nero Video 2016 available from 24 Euros (sold from Germany) and Pinnacle Studio 19 starting at £40-ish (in the UK), so neither exactly break the bank considering the amount of sophistication on-board.Ĭommercial video editing used to start at £100 and go up through the roof from there on, but it's a LOT cheaper these days and, considering the amount of time you'll both spend and save in terms of relatively gentle learning curves, there really is little reason to spend tens of hours fiddling with a tool that's really not fit for purpose when a little outlay will see you getting on with your life much more quickly.
![pinnacle studio 19 reviews pinnacle studio 19 reviews](https://i.joecomp.com/img/software/pinnacle-studio-hd-14-ultimate-review.jpg)
Oh, before you accuse me of selling my soul to commercial software, note that I did a lot of research into the dozens of various freeware and shareware alternatives, but didn't find any that weren't either a) buggy, b) nigh on impossible to figure out, c) too limited to be of any use, and d) infested with adware and other nasties.